<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 458 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418207</link>
    <description>The court granted regular bail to the applicant, who had been in custody for 20 months in connection with offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The court considered factors such as flight risk and influencing witnesses but allowed bail, imposing conditions including surrendering the passport and not leaving India without permission. The court emphasized the applicant&#039;s previous compliance with bail conditions and the absence of evidence of tampering or influencing witnesses during the interim bail period. The court&#039;s decision was based on the applicant&#039;s time spent in custody and imposed conditions to ensure cooperation with the prosecution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 07:19:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 458 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418207</link>
      <description>The court granted regular bail to the applicant, who had been in custody for 20 months in connection with offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The court considered factors such as flight risk and influencing witnesses but allowed bail, imposing conditions including surrendering the passport and not leaving India without permission. The court emphasized the applicant&#039;s previous compliance with bail conditions and the absence of evidence of tampering or influencing witnesses during the interim bail period. The court&#039;s decision was based on the applicant&#039;s time spent in custody and imposed conditions to ensure cooperation with the prosecution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>