<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 446 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418195</link>
    <description>Complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were examined in the context of cheques issued after successive compromise settlements. The Gujarat High Court noted that the settlements quantified the parties&#039; liability, including an augmented claim and a later bifurcation of the cheque amount from legal fees, and treated the post-settlement cheques as issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt. It also considered that the statutory notices were properly issued after dishonour and that prior failed settlement attempts did not bar prosecution at the threshold. The complaints were therefore treated as maintainable, and process was not interfered with.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 446 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418195</link>
      <description>Complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were examined in the context of cheques issued after successive compromise settlements. The Gujarat High Court noted that the settlements quantified the parties&#039; liability, including an augmented claim and a later bifurcation of the cheque amount from legal fees, and treated the post-settlement cheques as issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt. It also considered that the statutory notices were properly issued after dishonour and that prior failed settlement attempts did not bar prosecution at the threshold. The complaints were therefore treated as maintainable, and process was not interfered with.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>