<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (7) TMI 33 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27994</link>
    <description>A trust created from property received on partition was held valid because the settlor had full disposal rights over property that had devolved on him under section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and its earlier family origin did not make it ancestral in his hands. The Income-tax Officer was found to have exercised the option to assess the beneficiaries individually, since their trust income had already been included in those assessments and a rectification recital did not make them provisional in substance. For section 164(1), the beneficiaries&#039; shares in the trust income were indeterminate because the deed fixed no income shares and later equal entitlement to corpus did not determine them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:45:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (7) TMI 33 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27994</link>
      <description>A trust created from property received on partition was held valid because the settlor had full disposal rights over property that had devolved on him under section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and its earlier family origin did not make it ancestral in his hands. The Income-tax Officer was found to have exercised the option to assess the beneficiaries individually, since their trust income had already been included in those assessments and a rectification recital did not make them provisional in substance. For section 164(1), the beneficiaries&#039; shares in the trust income were indeterminate because the deed fixed no income shares and later equal entitlement to corpus did not determine them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>