<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Finds Insufficient Evidence of Timely Notice Service; Grants Dealer Another Chance Under TNVAT Rules.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61890</link>
    <description>Service of notice - whether pre-revisional notices was served on the writ petitioner-dealer - This is a fit case to give the benefit of doubt to the writ petitioner-dealer. This means that it has not been conclusively established {vide explanation to Rule 19(1)(a) of TNVAT Rules} that the pre-revisional notices dated 18.08.2014 have been duly served on the writ petitioner-dealer on 31.08.2014. This further means that the impugned orders will have to be interfered with on this short point and the writ petitioner-dealer has to be given opportunity afresh to show cause.- HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:42:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:42:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Finds Insufficient Evidence of Timely Notice Service; Grants Dealer Another Chance Under TNVAT Rules.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61890</link>
      <description>Service of notice - whether pre-revisional notices was served on the writ petitioner-dealer - This is a fit case to give the benefit of doubt to the writ petitioner-dealer. This means that it has not been conclusively established {vide explanation to Rule 19(1)(a) of TNVAT Rules} that the pre-revisional notices dated 18.08.2014 have been duly served on the writ petitioner-dealer on 31.08.2014. This further means that the impugned orders will have to be interfered with on this short point and the writ petitioner-dealer has to be given opportunity afresh to show cause.- HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:42:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>