<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 912 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300547</link>
    <description>After a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act reaches the post-summons stage, the Magistrate has no power to recall the summons or return the complaint at the accused&#039;s instance by resorting to Sections 202, 203 or 245 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The earlier ruling in Adalat Prasad was followed: once process is issued, the summons order cannot be reviewed or recalled before the Magistrate, and any challenge to an allegedly vitiated summons order must be taken under Section 482 of the Code. Territorial jurisdiction concerns did not justify recall in this manner, and the complaint was required to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 15:21:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 912 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300547</link>
      <description>After a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act reaches the post-summons stage, the Magistrate has no power to recall the summons or return the complaint at the accused&#039;s instance by resorting to Sections 202, 203 or 245 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The earlier ruling in Adalat Prasad was followed: once process is issued, the summons order cannot be reviewed or recalled before the Magistrate, and any challenge to an allegedly vitiated summons order must be taken under Section 482 of the Code. Territorial jurisdiction concerns did not justify recall in this manner, and the complaint was required to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>