<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 436 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418185</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the addition of commission income lacked substantial evidence and was based on presumptions. Emphasizing the need for concrete proof under section 153A, the Tribunal highlighted the importance of providing the assessee with a fair opportunity for cross-examination. Legal objections under Rule 27 were considered but dismissed as the appeal was already decided on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:55:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 436 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418185</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the addition of commission income lacked substantial evidence and was based on presumptions. Emphasizing the need for concrete proof under section 153A, the Tribunal highlighted the importance of providing the assessee with a fair opportunity for cross-examination. Legal objections under Rule 27 were considered but dismissed as the appeal was already decided on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>