<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 426 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418175</link>
    <description>The appeal for assessment year 2012-13 was allowed for statistical purposes, with directions to submit details for condonation of delay. The appeal for assessment year 2011-12 challenging the reopening of assessment was dismissed. The disallowance of 50% depreciation on the factory building was upheld by the Tribunal, emphasizing that rental income categorized as &quot;Income from House Property&quot; precludes the assessee from claiming depreciation on the let-out portion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 426 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418175</link>
      <description>The appeal for assessment year 2012-13 was allowed for statistical purposes, with directions to submit details for condonation of delay. The appeal for assessment year 2011-12 challenging the reopening of assessment was dismissed. The disallowance of 50% depreciation on the factory building was upheld by the Tribunal, emphasizing that rental income categorized as &quot;Income from House Property&quot; precludes the assessee from claiming depreciation on the let-out portion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>