<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 421 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418170</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the creation of fixed deposits in nationalized banks from Escrow Accounts for six months with auto-renewal. The Supreme Court directed the maintenance of Escrow Accounts without allowing fixed deposits, subject to NCLAT or competent authority orders. The Tribunal declined to direct fixed deposits, emphasizing the need for further consideration during fund distribution hearings. Applications for fund appropriation were closed due to pending matters, with liberty to renew. An application for modifying a previous order to file a Section 7 application was scheduled for further hearing, with the Respondent given two weeks to reply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:54:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 421 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418170</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the creation of fixed deposits in nationalized banks from Escrow Accounts for six months with auto-renewal. The Supreme Court directed the maintenance of Escrow Accounts without allowing fixed deposits, subject to NCLAT or competent authority orders. The Tribunal declined to direct fixed deposits, emphasizing the need for further consideration during fund distribution hearings. Applications for fund appropriation were closed due to pending matters, with liberty to renew. An application for modifying a previous order to file a Section 7 application was scheduled for further hearing, with the Respondent given two weeks to reply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>