<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 419 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418168</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 7 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the Corporate Debtor due to default in payments. The Financial Creditor, a NBFC, provided evidence of default, including bounced cheques and non-payment of EMIs, supported by arbitration awards and financial statements. Despite the Corporate Debtor&#039;s non-appearance and failure to comply with repayment schedules, the Tribunal found the application justified within the legal timeframe. Consequently, the petition triggered a moratorium, appointing an Insolvency Resolution Professional to oversee the process and submit a report to the Adjudicating Authority for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:54:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 419 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418168</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 7 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the Corporate Debtor due to default in payments. The Financial Creditor, a NBFC, provided evidence of default, including bounced cheques and non-payment of EMIs, supported by arbitration awards and financial statements. Despite the Corporate Debtor&#039;s non-appearance and failure to comply with repayment schedules, the Tribunal found the application justified within the legal timeframe. Consequently, the petition triggered a moratorium, appointing an Insolvency Resolution Professional to oversee the process and submit a report to the Adjudicating Authority for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>