<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 389 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418138</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee. It was established that the assessee did not furnish inaccurate particulars of income, and the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not warranted. The Tribunal also emphasized the significance of debatable issues and the impact of substantial questions of law framed by the High Court on penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 05:44:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 389 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418138</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee. It was established that the assessee did not furnish inaccurate particulars of income, and the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not warranted. The Tribunal also emphasized the significance of debatable issues and the impact of substantial questions of law framed by the High Court on penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>