<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 387 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418136</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the penalty notice issued was invalid due to non-specification of the exact charge, rendering the penalty levied unsustainable in law. The Tribunal quashed the penalty order on jurisdictional grounds, thus not adjudicating on the merits of the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer. The decision was pronounced on 03.02.2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 05:44:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 387 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418136</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the penalty notice issued was invalid due to non-specification of the exact charge, rendering the penalty levied unsustainable in law. The Tribunal quashed the penalty order on jurisdictional grounds, thus not adjudicating on the merits of the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer. The decision was pronounced on 03.02.2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>