<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 383 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418132</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263, ruling that the assessment order under section 143(3) was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal found the valuation certificate used by the assessee for determining fair market value of shares to be valid, as it was based on relevant data. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s application of Section 56(2)(viib) to the share premium received by the assessee, as the FMV of shares was deemed correctly determined. The Tribunal concluded that the AO&#039;s inquiry during assessment proceedings was adequate, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 05:44:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 383 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418132</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263, ruling that the assessment order under section 143(3) was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal found the valuation certificate used by the assessee for determining fair market value of shares to be valid, as it was based on relevant data. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s application of Section 56(2)(viib) to the share premium received by the assessee, as the FMV of shares was deemed correctly determined. The Tribunal concluded that the AO&#039;s inquiry during assessment proceedings was adequate, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>