https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418115 The NCLAT affirmed the NCLT's decision to dismiss the application under Section 252(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, for setting aside the striking off of the company's name by the ROC Coimbatore. The Appellant's failure to respond to show cause notices, establish grounds for restoration, or demonstrate efforts to revive the company led to the dismissal of the appeal. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of timely filings and proactive measures to maintain a company's active status under the Companies Act, 2013. en-us Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Feb 2022 05:43:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418115 The NCLAT affirmed the NCLT's decision to dismiss the application under Section 252(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, for setting aside the striking off of the company's name by the ROC Coimbatore. The Appellant's failure to respond to show cause notices, establish grounds for restoration, or demonstrate efforts to revive the company led to the dismissal of the appeal. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of timely filings and proactive measures to maintain a company's active status under the Companies Act, 2013. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418115