<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 361 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418110</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax on the commission shown in the export invoices. The deductions were considered trade discounts given to foreign buyers, not payments to commission agents. As no service provider or consideration for commission agent services was found, the tribunal set aside the demand for service tax, penalties, and interest. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, aligning with precedents that such deductions are not taxable under the relevant provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 361 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418110</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax on the commission shown in the export invoices. The deductions were considered trade discounts given to foreign buyers, not payments to commission agents. As no service provider or consideration for commission agent services was found, the tribunal set aside the demand for service tax, penalties, and interest. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, aligning with precedents that such deductions are not taxable under the relevant provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>