<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 360 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418109</link>
    <description>In a composite works contract for erection, installation and commissioning of lifts, VAT was paid on the goods component and service tax on the service component after bifurcation of contract value. The Tribunal applied the settled principle that VAT and service tax are mutually exclusive to the extent the same value cannot be taxed under both levies. It also noted that value on which VAT had already been discharged under the Tamil Nadu VAT Rules could not again be included for service tax under the service tax valuation rules. An earlier identical lift-installation decision was treated as directly applicable, and the demand, interest and penalties were held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 05:43:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 360 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418109</link>
      <description>In a composite works contract for erection, installation and commissioning of lifts, VAT was paid on the goods component and service tax on the service component after bifurcation of contract value. The Tribunal applied the settled principle that VAT and service tax are mutually exclusive to the extent the same value cannot be taxed under both levies. It also noted that value on which VAT had already been discharged under the Tamil Nadu VAT Rules could not again be included for service tax under the service tax valuation rules. An earlier identical lift-installation decision was treated as directly applicable, and the demand, interest and penalties were held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>