https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418105 The Tribunal set aside the denial of benefits under Notification No. 88/88-C.E. dated 01.03.1988 to the appellant, a handmade soap manufacturer registered as a Women's Society. The Tribunal found the denial unfounded, emphasizing the appellant's compliance with rules and submission of necessary documents proving eligibility. Lack of substantial evidence supporting the allegations in the Show Cause Notices led to the conclusion that the denial was arbitrary. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, highlighting the significance of documentary evidence and adherence to legal requirements in determining eligibility for statutory benefits. en-us Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Feb 2023 12:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418105 The Tribunal set aside the denial of benefits under Notification No. 88/88-C.E. dated 01.03.1988 to the appellant, a handmade soap manufacturer registered as a Women's Society. The Tribunal found the denial unfounded, emphasizing the appellant's compliance with rules and submission of necessary documents proving eligibility. Lack of substantial evidence supporting the allegations in the Show Cause Notices led to the conclusion that the denial was arbitrary. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, highlighting the significance of documentary evidence and adherence to legal requirements in determining eligibility for statutory benefits. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418105