https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418104 Allegations of cheating and criminal breach of trust arising from dishonoured cheques were treated as disclosing a cognizable offence, and the delay in lodging the FIR did not negate that disclosure on the facts. The absence of a notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 on record did not displace the prosecution case, and the allegation of dishonest intention could not be ruled out. The petitioner's failure to respond to notices under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was relied on as supporting the need for custodial interrogation. Anticipatory bail was refused. en-us Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Feb 2022 05:43:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418104 Allegations of cheating and criminal breach of trust arising from dishonoured cheques were treated as disclosing a cognizable offence, and the delay in lodging the FIR did not negate that disclosure on the facts. The absence of a notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 on record did not displace the prosecution case, and the allegation of dishonest intention could not be ruled out. The petitioner's failure to respond to notices under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was relied on as supporting the need for custodial interrogation. Anticipatory bail was refused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418104