<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1615 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300526</link>
    <description>The Writ Petition challenging the Order confirming a service tax demand and penalties imposed was allowed by the Court. Relying on a Supreme Court decision and previous rulings in the petitioner&#039;s case, the Court held in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the binding nature of the Supreme Court&#039;s decision. The service tax demand and penalties were set aside, and no costs were awarded in this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 05:42:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1615 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300526</link>
      <description>The Writ Petition challenging the Order confirming a service tax demand and penalties imposed was allowed by the Court. Relying on a Supreme Court decision and previous rulings in the petitioner&#039;s case, the Court held in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the binding nature of the Supreme Court&#039;s decision. The service tax demand and penalties were set aside, and no costs were awarded in this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>