https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300532 The appeal was successful as the tribunal concluded that no separate addition should be made in the appellant's case for undisclosed investment in jewellery. The tribunal emphasized centralizing cases of family members for a comprehensive determination of undisclosed income. Since the undisclosed income determined matched the income declared in the return, the addition of Rs. 41,48,174 was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed. en-us Tue, 21 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:20:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300532 The appeal was successful as the tribunal concluded that no separate addition should be made in the appellant's case for undisclosed investment in jewellery. The tribunal emphasized centralizing cases of family members for a comprehensive determination of undisclosed income. Since the undisclosed income determined matched the income declared in the return, the addition of Rs. 41,48,174 was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 21 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300532