<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 347 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418096</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the notice, approval, and reassessment proceedings under sections 148 and 151 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court found that the reasons for reopening the assessment did not demonstrate a failure to disclose material facts but rather indicated a change of opinion, which is impermissible. Emphasizing established legal principles, the court held that errors discovered upon reconsideration of existing material do not justify reopening assessments. The court&#039;s decision was in favor of the petitioner, highlighting the restrictions on reopening assessments based on a change of opinion rather than a genuine failure to disclose material facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:55:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 347 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418096</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the notice, approval, and reassessment proceedings under sections 148 and 151 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court found that the reasons for reopening the assessment did not demonstrate a failure to disclose material facts but rather indicated a change of opinion, which is impermissible. Emphasizing established legal principles, the court held that errors discovered upon reconsideration of existing material do not justify reopening assessments. The court&#039;s decision was in favor of the petitioner, highlighting the restrictions on reopening assessments based on a change of opinion rather than a genuine failure to disclose material facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>