<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 328 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418077</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the assessee was a valid trust, not an AOP, and the income was taxable in the hands of the SR Holders. The decision was based on identifiable beneficiaries, revocable contributions, and compliance with statutory provisions. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s arguments, emphasizing that the trust was not a tax evasion scheme but a legitimate entity for asset reconstruction activities under the SARFAESI Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 09:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 328 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418077</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the assessee was a valid trust, not an AOP, and the income was taxable in the hands of the SR Holders. The decision was based on identifiable beneficiaries, revocable contributions, and compliance with statutory provisions. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s arguments, emphasizing that the trust was not a tax evasion scheme but a legitimate entity for asset reconstruction activities under the SARFAESI Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>