<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 319 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418068</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the US-based company, holding that it does not have a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India. Consequently, issues related to profit attribution, taxability of royalty, and interest were considered academic. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to grant credit for Tax Deducted at Source and charge interest under Section 234C only on the returned income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:54:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 319 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418068</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the US-based company, holding that it does not have a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India. Consequently, issues related to profit attribution, taxability of royalty, and interest were considered academic. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to grant credit for Tax Deducted at Source and charge interest under Section 234C only on the returned income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>