<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 318 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418067</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions on account of unexplained investment, unsecured loans, and admission of undisclosed income. The Tribunal emphasized the need for corroborative evidence to support additions based on statements or unsigned documents, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 318 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418067</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions on account of unexplained investment, unsecured loans, and admission of undisclosed income. The Tribunal emphasized the need for corroborative evidence to support additions based on statements or unsigned documents, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>