<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 315 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418064</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside lower authorities&#039; orders. The property valuation under Section 50C was remanded for fresh consideration as the DVO&#039;s report was deemed insufficient. The disallowance of improvement cost, brokerage, and construction expenses was also remanded for proper assessment, recognizing their impact on capital gains determination. Both issues were sent back to the Assessing Officer for detailed examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:53:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 315 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418064</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside lower authorities&#039; orders. The property valuation under Section 50C was remanded for fresh consideration as the DVO&#039;s report was deemed insufficient. The disallowance of improvement cost, brokerage, and construction expenses was also remanded for proper assessment, recognizing their impact on capital gains determination. Both issues were sent back to the Assessing Officer for detailed examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>