<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 310 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418059</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the Detention Memo, Seizure order, and the Provisional release order. It directed the respondents to consider the amount already paid as full satisfaction of claims, release goods promptly, and close all proceedings related to tax, interest, and penalty within a week. The judgment favored the petitioner by emphasizing the voluntary payment made and ensuring prompt release of goods and conclusion of related proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 310 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418059</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the Detention Memo, Seizure order, and the Provisional release order. It directed the respondents to consider the amount already paid as full satisfaction of claims, release goods promptly, and close all proceedings related to tax, interest, and penalty within a week. The judgment favored the petitioner by emphasizing the voluntary payment made and ensuring prompt release of goods and conclusion of related proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>