<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 2075 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300501</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the deletion of the addition of Rs. 96,37,85,635/- towards capital gains under Section 45(3) of the Income Tax Act was justified. It was determined that the land in question was a current asset, not a capital asset, and the revaluation did not result in any taxable income for the assessee. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, confirming no taxable capital gain for the Assessment Year 2006-07.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 21:12:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 2075 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300501</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the deletion of the addition of Rs. 96,37,85,635/- towards capital gains under Section 45(3) of the Income Tax Act was justified. It was determined that the land in question was a current asset, not a capital asset, and the revaluation did not result in any taxable income for the assessee. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, confirming no taxable capital gain for the Assessment Year 2006-07.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>