<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1621 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300507</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the petitions as devoid of merit. It emphasized that the cancellation of registration did not occur before the transactions and upheld the validity of the assessee&#039;s actions based on the registration in force at the time of the transactions. The court distinguished the judgment in the case of Shri Krishna Engg. Co. &amp;amp; Others and ruled in favor of the assessee against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1621 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300507</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the petitions as devoid of merit. It emphasized that the cancellation of registration did not occur before the transactions and upheld the validity of the assessee&#039;s actions based on the registration in force at the time of the transactions. The court distinguished the judgment in the case of Shri Krishna Engg. Co. &amp;amp; Others and ruled in favor of the assessee against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>