https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418043 The HC stayed a GST notice issued under Section 73 of APGST Act, 2017 demanding payment on minerals for which royalty had already been paid. The petitioner challenged the notice as illegal and unconstitutional, citing a similar case where the SC had stayed GST payment for mining lease/royalty. The court granted interim protection considering that a Nine Judges Bench of the SC is currently examining whether GST should be charged on minerals already subject to royalty payments. The matter will be listed after the SC disposes of related cases. en-us Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 13:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418043 The HC stayed a GST notice issued under Section 73 of APGST Act, 2017 demanding payment on minerals for which royalty had already been paid. The petitioner challenged the notice as illegal and unconstitutional, citing a similar case where the SC had stayed GST payment for mining lease/royalty. The court granted interim protection considering that a Nine Judges Bench of the SC is currently examining whether GST should be charged on minerals already subject to royalty payments. The matter will be listed after the SC disposes of related cases. Case-Laws GST Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418043