<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 283 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418032</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that an &quot;Agreement to Sell&quot; did not result in the transfer of the property, overturning the A.O.&#039;s decision. The Tribunal concluded that the computation of capital gain made by the A.O. for the assessment year 2011-12 was incorrect and upheld the assessee&#039;s computation. As a result, the Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee, setting aside the orders of the lower authorities regarding the computation of capital gain for both years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2022 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 283 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418032</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that an &quot;Agreement to Sell&quot; did not result in the transfer of the property, overturning the A.O.&#039;s decision. The Tribunal concluded that the computation of capital gain made by the A.O. for the assessment year 2011-12 was incorrect and upheld the assessee&#039;s computation. As a result, the Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee, setting aside the orders of the lower authorities regarding the computation of capital gain for both years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>