<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 274 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418023</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 1998-99 to 2004-05, ruling that notices issued under Section 148 were time-barred and invalid. It held that interest income from undisclosed foreign accounts should be taxed in the hands of the actual owners who declared the income. The Tribunal also invalidated the reopening of assessments beyond the limitation period and prevented double taxation of the same income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 08:13:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 274 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418023</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 1998-99 to 2004-05, ruling that notices issued under Section 148 were time-barred and invalid. It held that interest income from undisclosed foreign accounts should be taxed in the hands of the actual owners who declared the income. The Tribunal also invalidated the reopening of assessments beyond the limitation period and prevented double taxation of the same income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>