<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 271 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418020</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Private Limited Company, holding that the amendments made by the Finance Act, 2021, were prospective and not retrospective. Consequently, the additions under Section 36(1)(va) were deleted due to the distinction between employees&#039; and employer&#039;s contributions and the prospective application of the amendments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 271 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418020</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Private Limited Company, holding that the amendments made by the Finance Act, 2021, were prospective and not retrospective. Consequently, the additions under Section 36(1)(va) were deleted due to the distinction between employees&#039; and employer&#039;s contributions and the prospective application of the amendments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>