<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 256 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AMARAVATI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418005</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the application, directing the majority shareholder to convene an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) and implement necessary steps for the company&#039;s operations, considering the shareholder&#039;s significant equity shareholding as constituting a valid quorum for the EGM. The appointment of directors on the Board was deemed essential for compliance with legal requirements and proper business functioning, with prior invalidations complicating the situation. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the provisions of Section 98 of the Companies Act, 2013, granting authority to order and conduct meetings in specific circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2022 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 256 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AMARAVATI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418005</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the application, directing the majority shareholder to convene an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) and implement necessary steps for the company&#039;s operations, considering the shareholder&#039;s significant equity shareholding as constituting a valid quorum for the EGM. The appointment of directors on the Board was deemed essential for compliance with legal requirements and proper business functioning, with prior invalidations complicating the situation. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the provisions of Section 98 of the Companies Act, 2013, granting authority to order and conduct meetings in specific circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>