https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417994 The High Court quashed the condition imposed by the 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural), directing the applicant to pay 20% of the cheque amount in a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Court held that only the trial court has the authority to order interim compensation under Section 143A of the Act, and the Revision Court's directive was legally flawed and premature. The Court emphasized that the Revision Court's decision was based on irrelevant grounds and contrary to the provisions of the Act, ordering the condition to be quashed and set aside. en-us Fri, 04 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Feb 2022 19:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417994 The High Court quashed the condition imposed by the 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural), directing the applicant to pay 20% of the cheque amount in a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Court held that only the trial court has the authority to order interim compensation under Section 143A of the Act, and the Revision Court's directive was legally flawed and premature. The Court emphasized that the Revision Court's decision was based on irrelevant grounds and contrary to the provisions of the Act, ordering the condition to be quashed and set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417994