https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417992 An adverse reversal of an earlier governmental decision to hand over movable and immovable property and cash could not be sustained where the affected parties were not given a prior hearing. The petitioners had acted on the initial decision, including withdrawing a succession application, and the later stay or cancellation directly affected their civil rights in property. Since natural justice required an opportunity to be heard before such a prejudicial change, the impugned cancellation could not stand. The matter was directed to be reconsidered afresh after giving the petitioners an opportunity of hearing. en-us Wed, 02 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Feb 2022 12:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417992 An adverse reversal of an earlier governmental decision to hand over movable and immovable property and cash could not be sustained where the affected parties were not given a prior hearing. The petitioners had acted on the initial decision, including withdrawing a succession application, and the later stay or cancellation directly affected their civil rights in property. Since natural justice required an opportunity to be heard before such a prejudicial change, the impugned cancellation could not stand. The matter was directed to be reconsidered afresh after giving the petitioners an opportunity of hearing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417992