<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1274 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300495</link>
    <description>The court issued notice to the respondent&#039;s advocate, who accepted it, and granted six weeks to file a counter affidavit. The petitioner&#039;s request for an interim stay was declined, considering the prayer for refund of taxes sufficient to protect the petitioner&#039;s interest. The matter was listed before the Joint Registrar (Judicial) for completion of pleadings on 10th December 2021. The order was directed to be uploaded on the website immediately, with a copy sent to the counsel via email. The judgment reflects a procedural progression in response to the legal challenges raised by the petitioner regarding tax deductions and the nature of payments received, ensuring due process and timelines for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2022 14:41:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1274 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300495</link>
      <description>The court issued notice to the respondent&#039;s advocate, who accepted it, and granted six weeks to file a counter affidavit. The petitioner&#039;s request for an interim stay was declined, considering the prayer for refund of taxes sufficient to protect the petitioner&#039;s interest. The matter was listed before the Joint Registrar (Judicial) for completion of pleadings on 10th December 2021. The order was directed to be uploaded on the website immediately, with a copy sent to the counsel via email. The judgment reflects a procedural progression in response to the legal challenges raised by the petitioner regarding tax deductions and the nature of payments received, ensuring due process and timelines for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>