<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 240 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417989</link>
    <description>Comprehensive architectural services supplied as pure services to a municipal corporation were treated as exempt under Sr. No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) because the recipient was a local authority and the work related to a municipal function under Article 243W. The services concerned repairs, restoration and reconstruction of a recreation ground-cum-textile museum, and the relevant municipal nexus was traced to the municipal corporation&#039;s statutory functions under the applicable municipal law. The exemption was not denied merely because the activity was not expressly named in the Twelfth Schedule, as a direct statutory link to a municipal function was sufficient. The services were therefore held exempt from GST.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 240 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417989</link>
      <description>Comprehensive architectural services supplied as pure services to a municipal corporation were treated as exempt under Sr. No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) because the recipient was a local authority and the work related to a municipal function under Article 243W. The services concerned repairs, restoration and reconstruction of a recreation ground-cum-textile museum, and the relevant municipal nexus was traced to the municipal corporation&#039;s statutory functions under the applicable municipal law. The exemption was not denied merely because the activity was not expressly named in the Twelfth Schedule, as a direct statutory link to a municipal function was sufficient. The services were therefore held exempt from GST.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>