<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 223 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417972</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the reopening of the assessment and the additions made under Section 69. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO did not have any fresh tangible material to justify the reopening and that the reassessment was based on a change of opinion, which is not permissible under the law. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 31st January 2022 at Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2022 08:25:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 223 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417972</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the reopening of the assessment and the additions made under Section 69. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO did not have any fresh tangible material to justify the reopening and that the reassessment was based on a change of opinion, which is not permissible under the law. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 31st January 2022 at Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>