<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 222 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417971</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai partially allowed the appeal, modifying the ad hoc disallowance of development expenses to 10% of the total amount, disagreeing with the AO&#039;s and CIT(A)&#039;s arbitrary estimation. The ITAT emphasized the lack of prescribed rules for such disallowances and directed the AO to limit the disallowance accordingly. The decision set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and was delivered on January 31, 2022, in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2022 08:25:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 222 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417971</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai partially allowed the appeal, modifying the ad hoc disallowance of development expenses to 10% of the total amount, disagreeing with the AO&#039;s and CIT(A)&#039;s arbitrary estimation. The ITAT emphasized the lack of prescribed rules for such disallowances and directed the AO to limit the disallowance accordingly. The decision set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and was delivered on January 31, 2022, in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>