<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 216 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417965</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the addition of Rs. 8,08,313/- under Section 36(1)(va) was not sustainable as contributions were deposited before the return due date. It held that the Finance Act, 2021 amendments were prospective, not retroactive, for the assessment year. The decision was made on January 12, 2022, via Webex.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2022 08:25:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 216 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417965</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the addition of Rs. 8,08,313/- under Section 36(1)(va) was not sustainable as contributions were deposited before the return due date. It held that the Finance Act, 2021 amendments were prospective, not retroactive, for the assessment year. The decision was made on January 12, 2022, via Webex.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>