<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 203 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AMARAVATI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417952</link>
    <description>The Petition was dismissed by the Tribunal due to the lack of evidence proving the application was filed before the pecuniary jurisdiction change, inadmissibility of WhatsApp messages as evidence, and the failure to establish the debt as a financial debt under Section 5(8) of IBC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2022 08:24:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 203 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AMARAVATI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417952</link>
      <description>The Petition was dismissed by the Tribunal due to the lack of evidence proving the application was filed before the pecuniary jurisdiction change, inadmissibility of WhatsApp messages as evidence, and the failure to establish the debt as a financial debt under Section 5(8) of IBC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>