<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 197 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417946</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, modifying the Commissioner&#039;s decision to credit the refund amount to the consumer welfare fund. The Tribunal directed the refund amount, along with interest, to be paid to the Appellant within three months, based on the interpretation of legal principles, including unjust enrichment, and the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2022 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 197 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417946</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, modifying the Commissioner&#039;s decision to credit the refund amount to the consumer welfare fund. The Tribunal directed the refund amount, along with interest, to be paid to the Appellant within three months, based on the interpretation of legal principles, including unjust enrichment, and the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>