<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1780 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300489</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, deleting the additions of Rs. 17,00,000/- in each case, as they were based solely on fictitious balance-sheet entries created by Shri Pankaj Danawala without any benefit accruing to the assessees. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessees were victims of Shri Pankaj Danawala&#039;s actions and had not derived any real income or assets from the fictitious entries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2022 08:24:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1780 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300489</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, deleting the additions of Rs. 17,00,000/- in each case, as they were based solely on fictitious balance-sheet entries created by Shri Pankaj Danawala without any benefit accruing to the assessees. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessees were victims of Shri Pankaj Danawala&#039;s actions and had not derived any real income or assets from the fictitious entries.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>