<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal Maintained Despite Minor Delay, No Malafide Intent; Commissioner Liberally Applies Limitation Law for Merits Resolution.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61794</link>
    <description>Maintainability of appeal - time limitation - No doubt there was no application seeking Condonation of delay was filed by the appellant as has been acknowledged by ld. Counsel as on date as well - The delay is so minuscule that the malafide intent cannot be opined against the appellant. Law is otherwise settled that the disposal of a lis shall always be on merits. Law of limitation is otherwise to be exercised liberally. - It is deemed to be a fit case where Commissioner (Appeals) should have decided the appeal on merits after liberally exercising his discretion of condoning the delay - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 15:16:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 15:16:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal Maintained Despite Minor Delay, No Malafide Intent; Commissioner Liberally Applies Limitation Law for Merits Resolution.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61794</link>
      <description>Maintainability of appeal - time limitation - No doubt there was no application seeking Condonation of delay was filed by the appellant as has been acknowledged by ld. Counsel as on date as well - The delay is so minuscule that the malafide intent cannot be opined against the appellant. Law is otherwise settled that the disposal of a lis shall always be on merits. Law of limitation is otherwise to be exercised liberally. - It is deemed to be a fit case where Commissioner (Appeals) should have decided the appeal on merits after liberally exercising his discretion of condoning the delay - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 15:16:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>