https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417938 The HC disposed of an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.PC by an accused fearing false implication in a GST input tax credit fraud case. Finding no evidence linking the applicant to the alleged offense, the court directed that if authorities decide to take coercive action under Section 69 of CGST Act, they must provide seven days' advance notice. The applicant was ordered to cooperate with the investigation and furnish all requested information and documents. The court noted that while the applicant's father was formerly a director of the company under investigation, the applicant himself had no connection with it. en-us Mon, 06 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 15:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417938 The HC disposed of an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.PC by an accused fearing false implication in a GST input tax credit fraud case. Finding no evidence linking the applicant to the alleged offense, the court directed that if authorities decide to take coercive action under Section 69 of CGST Act, they must provide seven days' advance notice. The applicant was ordered to cooperate with the investigation and furnish all requested information and documents. The court noted that while the applicant's father was formerly a director of the company under investigation, the applicant himself had no connection with it. Case-Laws GST Mon, 06 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417938