<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 188 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417937</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the validity of the notice seeking to reopen the assessment for Assessment Year 2017-18, stating that the respondents had sufficient grounds to believe that income had escaped assessment based on substantial cash deposits and failure to file returns. The petition was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of forming a reasonable belief before issuing such notices and urging a fair assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 188 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417937</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the validity of the notice seeking to reopen the assessment for Assessment Year 2017-18, stating that the respondents had sufficient grounds to believe that income had escaped assessment based on substantial cash deposits and failure to file returns. The petition was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of forming a reasonable belief before issuing such notices and urging a fair assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>