<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 181 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417930</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and ruled that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not justified for disallowances made on an estimated basis without concrete evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was canceled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 07:02:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 181 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417930</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and ruled that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not justified for disallowances made on an estimated basis without concrete evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was canceled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>