<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 176 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417925</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by directing the deletion of the disallowance of compensation paid for breach of contract under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that once TDS is deducted, even at a lower rate, disallowance cannot be invoked. Additionally, the Tribunal restricted the disallowance of foreign travel expenses to Rs. 2,50,000, highlighting the necessity of specific evidence to justify business expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 176 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417925</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by directing the deletion of the disallowance of compensation paid for breach of contract under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that once TDS is deducted, even at a lower rate, disallowance cannot be invoked. Additionally, the Tribunal restricted the disallowance of foreign travel expenses to Rs. 2,50,000, highlighting the necessity of specific evidence to justify business expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>