<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 168 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417917</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding the disallowance of Rs. 6,60,000 for Bank Guarantee written off and Rs. 1,03,664 for Depreciation. The decisions were based on the lack of evidence provided by the appellant to substantiate the claims, resulting in the failure to meet the burden of proof required. The disallowances were upheld as the appellant could not prove the genuineness of the amounts in question, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 07:01:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 168 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417917</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding the disallowance of Rs. 6,60,000 for Bank Guarantee written off and Rs. 1,03,664 for Depreciation. The decisions were based on the lack of evidence provided by the appellant to substantiate the claims, resulting in the failure to meet the burden of proof required. The disallowances were upheld as the appellant could not prove the genuineness of the amounts in question, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>