<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (4) TMI 44 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27932</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the assessee was entitled to carry forward the development rebate claimed for the assessment year 1966-67 to be adjusted against the profits of the assessment year 1967-68. The court emphasized that the creation of the reserve in the subsequent year sufficed, as statutory provisions did not mandate the reserve to be created in the year of installation in the absence of profits. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:00:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (4) TMI 44 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27932</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the assessee was entitled to carry forward the development rebate claimed for the assessment year 1966-67 to be adjusted against the profits of the assessment year 1967-68. The court emphasized that the creation of the reserve in the subsequent year sufficed, as statutory provisions did not mandate the reserve to be created in the year of installation in the absence of profits. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>