<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 155 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417904</link>
    <description>The Court held that the suspension order issued under the Custom Broker Licensing Regulation, 2013 had expired due to non-compliance with the prescribed procedures for continuation. Despite a show cause notice being issued, the respondent failed to follow the necessary steps for revoking the license within the stipulated timeframe. As a result, the Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, declaring the suspension order no longer valid and granting liberty to the respondent to initiate proceedings under Regulation 20 if required. The judgment disposed of the Writ Petition while ensuring that the order did not prejudice the ongoing proceedings against the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 07:00:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 155 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417904</link>
      <description>The Court held that the suspension order issued under the Custom Broker Licensing Regulation, 2013 had expired due to non-compliance with the prescribed procedures for continuation. Despite a show cause notice being issued, the respondent failed to follow the necessary steps for revoking the license within the stipulated timeframe. As a result, the Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, declaring the suspension order no longer valid and granting liberty to the respondent to initiate proceedings under Regulation 20 if required. The judgment disposed of the Writ Petition while ensuring that the order did not prejudice the ongoing proceedings against the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>